Biases in Science (10 - 12 April 2019)

Idea and Motivation
One of the main obstacles of reliable scientific research is the occurrence of explicit or implicit biases. Well-known examples of such biases include the confirmation bias, the ingroup bias, and biases resulting from industry-sponsored research. Each of these biases may impede the objectivity of scientific inquiry by, among other things, influencing one’s judgement as to what counts as relevant evidence, or one's selection of research problems and methods of inquiry. All this, in turn, may ultimately affect the explanations, the predictions, as well as the broader theoretical accounts accepted by scientists. What is more, as research results often provide direct input for policy making, the problem of biases in science is also of socio-political relevance.
This conference aims at bringing together scholars from philosophy, the sciences, and science policy, to advance our understanding of biases in science by addressing questions such as:
How do psychological mechanisms for scientific biases differ from those underpinning everyday biases in categorization, diagnosis, induction, etc.?
What social mechanisms catalyse biased research?
How can biased reasoning and information sharing be formally modelled?
How are general hypotheses concerning bias supported by concrete cases of biased research?
How are answers to the above questions helpful in mitigating the risks of biased research?
Program
Day 1 (10 April 2019)
Time | Event |
09:30 - 10:00 |
Registration |
10:00 - 11:15 |
Jacob Stegenga (Keynote Talk): Debiasing Inference Chair: Stephan Hartmann |
11:15 - 11:45 |
Coffee Break |
11:45 - 12:15 |
Alexander Reutlinger: Why Some Non-Epistemic Influences on Science Are Illegitimate – An Evidential Account Chair: Jan Sprenger |
12:15 - 12:45 |
David Teira: Replication and Biases: a Contractarian Approach Chair: Jan Sprenger |
12:45 - 13:15 |
Charles Beasley: Bias in Comparative Psychology: Reconsidering The Neyman-Pearson Method Chair: Jan Sprenger |
13:15 - 14:45 |
Lunch Break |
14:45 - 15:15 |
Torsten Wilholt: Bias, Fraud and Interests in Science Chair: Matteo Colombo |
15:15 - 15:45 |
Boaz Miller: Group Knowledge: Beyond Aggregation versus Deliberation Chair: Matteo Colombo |
15:45 - 16:15 |
Bennett Holman: An Agenda for the Formal Modeling of Bias Chair: Matteo Colombo |
16:15 - 16:45 |
Coffee Break |
16:45 - 17:15 |
Stephan Hartmann and Soroush Rafiee Rad: Anchoring in Deliberations Chair: Manuela Fernández Pinto |
17:15 - 17:45 |
Inkeri Koskinen and Rusanen Anna-Mari: AI, Objectivity and Epistemic Risks Chair: Manuela Fernández Pinto |
18:30 |
Informal gathering at Max Emanuel |
Day 2 (11 April 2019)
Time | Event |
10:00 - 11:15 |
Inmaculada de Melo-Martín (Keynote Talk): Biases and the Commercialization of the Biomedical Sciences: Where We Ought to Go Depends a Great Deal on Where We Want to Get to Chair: Lorenzo Casini |
11:15 - 11:45 |
Coffee Break |
11:45 - 12:15 |
Manuela Fernández Pinto: Industrial Selection Bias: How Serious Is It and What to Do About It Chair: Torsten Wilholt |
12:15 - 12:45 |
Simon Scheller: Are Democratically Organised Research Teams More Resilient Against Biases and Special Interests? Chair: Torsten Wilholt |
12:45 - 13:15 |
Annemarie Borg, Daniel Frey, Dunja Šešelja, and Christian Straßer: Modeling Bias and Deception in Scientific Inquiry Chair: Torsten Wilholt |
13:15 - 14:45 |
Lunch Break |
14:45 - 15:15 |
Vlasta Sikimic: The Sunk Cost Bias and the Halting Problem in Science Chair: Simon Scheller |
15:15 - 15:45 |
Lorenzo Casini and Jan Sprenger: Meta-Analyses and Conflicts of Interest Chair: Simon Scheller |
15:45 - 16:15 |
Stijn Conix and Andreas De Block: Bias in Moral Philosophy Chair: Simon Scheller |
16:15 - 16:45 |
Coffee Break |
16:45 - 17:15 |
Jitka Paitlová and Petr Jedlička: Objectivity in the Natural Sciences: An Empirical Investigation Chair: David Teira |
17:15 - 17:45 |
Silvia Ivani, Matteo Colombo and Leandra Bucher: Uncertainty in Science: A Study on the Role of Non-Cognitive Values in the Assessment of Inductive Risk Chair: David Teira |
19:00 |
Conference Dinner (Restaurant Arabesk) |
Day 3 (12 April 2019)
Time | Event |
10:00 - 11:15 |
Ulrike Hahn (Keynote Talk): Another Look at Confirmation Bias Chair: Marcel Weber |
11:15 - 11:45 |
Coffee Break |
11:45 - 12:15 |
Joshua Mugg and Muhammad Ali Khalidi: The Self-Reflexive Bias Paradox Chair: Bennett Holman |
12:15 - 12:45 |
Juergen Landes: Less is More: On the Value of Agents’ Testimony Chair: Bennett Holman |
12:45 - 13:15 |
Christoph Merdes, Ulrike Hahn and Momme Von Sydow: Modeling Confirmation Bias with Sequential Reliability Learning Chair: Bennett Holman |
13:15 - 14:45 |
Lunch Break |
14:45 - 15:15 |
Alexander Krauss: How our Mind Constrains and Biases our Scientific Theories Chair: Alexander Reutlinger |
15:15 - 15:45 |
Noah van Dongen and Michał Sikorski: Objectivity for the Research Worker Chair: Alexander Reutlinger |
15.45 - 16:15 |
Tobias Henschen: The Role of Non-Scientific Values in Macroeconomics Chair: Alexander Reutlinger |
16:15 - 16:45 |
Coffee Break |
16:45 - 18:00 |
Olivier Roy (Keynote Talk): Deliberation, Single-Peaknedness, and Voting Cycles Chair: Dunja Šešelja |
Acknowledgement
The conference is organized by the Munich Center for Mathematical Philosophy (LMU Munich) and funded by Stephan Hartmann and Marcel Weber's DFG-SNF Research Grant "Inferentialism, Bayesianism and Scientific Explanation".